major private equity energy portfolios tracked
energy investments since 2010
unique energy assets linked to private equity firms
annual CO2e emissions from fossil fuel assets
Overview
Private equity remains heavily concentrated in fossil fuels, with most energy portfolios dominated by carbon-intensive assets and limited alignment with 1.5°C climate targets.
The Private Equity Tracker provides asset- and company-level visibility into how major private equity firms shape the global energy system. Covering more than twenty leading firms, the dataset links investors to hundreds of portfolio companies and underlying fossil fuel assets across the upstream, midstream, and downstream sectors. Together, these firms have invested over $1 trillion in energy since 2010, with fossil fuels comprising the majority of their energy holdings.
Private equity ownership of energy infrastructure has expanded significantly over the past decade, often shifting carbon-intensive assets out of public markets into private portfolios with fewer disclosure requirements. Portfolio companies controlled by these firms own coal plants, gas-fired power stations, oil and gas fields, LNG terminals, and major pipeline networks. In aggregate, the energy portfolios of leading firms support assets that emit over a gigaton of CO2-equivalent emissions annually, comparable to the emissions of large industrialized economies.
Geographically, assets are concentrated in North America and Europe but extend globally, with significant exposure to gas-fired power and midstream infrastructure. Private equity has also expanded into utility ownership and gas supply chains linked to data center growth, positioning the sector at emerging demand nodes.
Sectorally, fossil fuel companies make up a majority of most firms’ energy portfolios, and the pace of divestment remains slow; at current trajectories, some firms would not fully exit fossil fuels until the year 2090. This misalignment with climate targets creates transition risk for investors and exposes communities to ongoing health and pollution impacts, while limited disclosure requirements reduce transparency compared with public markets.
By connecting financial sponsors to specific assets, infrastructure and emissions, the tracker provides transparency into how private capital influences the energy transition. The data help regulators, institutional investors, researchers, and frontline communities assess climate exposure, identify leverage points, and evaluate whether private equity investment strategies are accelerating or delaying decarbonization.
Private equity fossil fuel infrastructure is estimated to cost the U.S. $15B+ annually in health impacts.
Fossil fuels dominate most firms’ energy holdings despite net-zero commitments.
What's inside?
Methodology
The Private Equity Tracker at Global Energy monitor is part of a multi-organization initiative known as the Private Equity Climate Risks (PECR) project, which investigates the role of the private equity industry in the climate crisis.
As a part of this project, GEM analyzes the social and environmental impacts of fossil fuel infrastructure to provide insights on the industry’s role in the climate crisis. GEM collaborates with The Private Equity Stakeholder Project (PESP) and Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund (AFREF) in a research consortium to investigate private equity investments in energy companies and related assets.
A key aim of this project is to demand better accountability in the private equity industry through reports and other campaign activities, highlighting discrepancies between private equity firms’ publicly stated Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) commitments and their actual investment practices.
The project’s work to date has focused on twenty of the largest private equity firms and their involvement in the fossil fuel industry, as summarized in the PECR 2024 Scorecard and Report.
Since private equity firms do not provide comprehensive disclosures of current or former investments, the research team builds a data set based on a variety of sources. First, we conduct an initial query of energy holdings via the private markets data provider Pitchbook. Researchers then collect additional sources to build a data set of verified current portfolio company investments for a given PE firm, including company websites, press releases, SEC and other regulatory filings, and news articles.
Private equity firms invest in portfolio companies through various strategies including leveraged buyouts, majority stake investments, minority stake investments, control or non-control investments, credit or lending investments, joint ventures, via intermediaries or directly, and others. The precise nature of each investment arrangement is often not disclosed, but these investments all provide capital to portfolio companies that enable their operations and the associated emissions and environmental impacts. A given PE firm’s current energy portfolio reflects the firm’s financial interests via any one or more financial strategies listed above to “invest in” or “own” or “back” each portfolio company, thereby facilitating the activity of the company and its assets.
The data set of current portfolio companies and assets researched by this group is typically shared with the PE firm in question ahead of any publications to collect any feedback/corrections from the firm.
Once the deal and company information are verified with open source data, the next step of the process is to identify the assets currently owned by portfolio companies. This is accomplished by searching through a variety of online sources including Global Energy Monitor data, portfolio company websites, news articles, press releases, corporate financial reports, and government databases including those from the Environmental Protection Agency (the FLIGHT tool and the ECHO database), the Energy Information Administration (Form 860), and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, and others.
Downstream: The Downstream sector focuses on energy-generating assets, and is broken down into fossil and renewable energy categories.
Within the fossil category, we include coal, gas, oil, refined petroleum (gasoline, diesel, etc.), and biomass power plants. Although biomass is not a traditional fossil fuel, we included it in the fossil category based on perspectives from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, which notes that “burning biomass releases about the same amount of carbon dioxide as burning fossil fuels.”
In the renewable category, we include utility-scale energy generation technologies that utilize solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal technologies.
Midstream: In the midstream category, we document assets responsible for storing, transporting, and processing fuels. This includes assets like pipelines, terminals, storage containers/facilities, refineries, and cryo facilities responsible for converting natural gas from a gaseous form into a liquid form. These assets can span gas, coal, oil, refined petroleum, and biomass fuel types.
Upstream: The upstream sector includes assets responsible for the original extraction of oil, gas, and coal from the earth, both onshore and offshore. Because of the complications frequently associated with naming an upstream extraction site, for upstream assets, we commonly make note of production levels from the entire group of assets owned by one company in one area/basin. For example, if PE firm “XYZ” is invested in three gas extraction sites in the Permian basin through one portfolio company, we will typically group these three into one asset and label them “XYZ Permian Basin Assets” and aggregate annual oil/gas production numbers into a single figure.
Emissions Scope: Private equity firms have impacts on the climate through both their corporate operations and their investment portfolios through direct and indirect emissions. The investment portfolio typically has far, far greater impacts, and accounts for around 99 percent of emissions. To capture the entire emissions footprint of private equity firm activities, the PECR project believes that scopes 1, 2, and 3 emissions should be disclosed both at the firm level and across the full investment portfolio.
To capture the climate impacts from a PE firm’s most carbon-intensive activities, our research activities typically focus on a subset of the investment portfolio—the fossil fuels assets of portfolio companies. We look at the emissions associated with upstream, midstream, and downstream energy infrastructure, including stationary combustion, fugitive emissions, and process emissions from portfolio companies. This means that there are elements of Scope 1 and 2 emissions from portfolio companies not included, such as the emissions associated with electricity and HVAC in their offices, and that we also exclude Scope 3 emissions related to the downstream portfolio. Thus, the emissions from a PE firm’s energy and infrastructure portfolio companies calculated by this project do not represent the firm’s total emissions, but more than likely represent the vast majority of portfolio energy company emissions from that PE firm.
Downstream: For downstream power plants, we collect plant capacity from public sources (such as news articles, financial reports, and company websites) and then apply average emissions factors by plant type from EIA’s Electric Power Monthly’s “Chapter 6. Capacity” data. This results in estimated generation values, which are then used in conjunction with the EPA eGRID emissions factors based on plant type to calculate more accurate emissions estimates.
Midstream: By definition, the midstream sector does not include points of fuel extraction (upstream) or points of fuel combustion/primary use (downstream). Given this, when making emissions calculations, we do not include the emissions produced when burning the fuels themselves, and instead focus on the process and fugitive emissions associated with transporting, storing, and processing the fuels. That is, it takes energy to transport a fuel such as gas, and gas also leaks during this process, and both of these factors result in emissions attributable to the midstream sector. The utilization factor for midstream assets (e.g. pipelines, storage containers, refineries) is not always a discoverable fact throughout the research process. To make an estimate, several sources were consulted, several of which point to an annual utilization factor of 70 percent, which is applied across midstream assets where utilization factors are not found.
When calculating fugitive emissions from midstream assets, wherever possible the emissions factors from the 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Chapter 4: Fugitive Emissions are used.
Additional emissions factors outside of the IPCC table are used when necessary.
- For LNG terminals, the emissions factor for the LNG liquefaction process is an average of five emissions factors from a 2020 NRDC study on lifecycle emissions of LNG.
- For marine tankers, the Annual Efficiency Ratio formula is utilized to calculate emissions from fuel used to power the ship. Deadweight tonnage and nautical miles traveled per year per ship are sourced from VesselFinder. AER-specific data is sourced from the annual ESG reports of those portfolio companies wherever possible.
- For coal storage, the emission factor for fugitive methane is an average from 52 coal sources across the United States and Canada (annual average = 0.74 cubic meters CH4/tonne coal/year) as calculated within a 2012 study conducted by Canada’s Ontario Ministry for the Environment.
- For biomass storage, the emissions factor is sourced from a 2018 article on the subject published in Renewable Energy and Sustainable Energy Reviews. For cryo gas facilities, the emissions factor used was calculated in 2012 by Ken Chow at energy consultancy Muse, Stancil & Co.
Upstream: The upstream emissions are calculated utilizing RMI’s OCI+ database on oil and gas supply chain emissions. Upstream and embedded fuel emissions factors by basin are utilized. Where a specific basin is not available in the database, we source the closest nearby basin in the OCI database. When we do not have information on a particular basin owned by the portfolio company, an average of all upstream emissions factors for basins that the PE firm in question is invested in is applied. Additional upstream data is cross-referenced from Carbon Tracker Initiative using Rystad Energy data, which uses emissions factors that are broadly in line with the IPCC’s Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
Comprehensive (Upstream, Midstream, and Downstream): To calculate a comprehensive emissions number, steps are taken to avoid double counting emissions associated with upstream and downstream emissions. Upstream emissions calculations incorporate the emissions content of the fuels themselves. If these embedded fuel emissions are then counted again in the downstream sector, this would be a double count. To avoid this when calculating the comprehensive total, marginal downstream emissions are only added to the total when the downstream values exceed the upstream emissions values for a given fuel type (e.g. downstream gas plants and upstream gas extraction).
Frequently Asked Questions
A private equity firm is a type of investment firm that uses capital from investors to acquire or invest in companies. Private equity firms raise capital from institutional investors, wealthy individuals, and sometimes the public. This capital is pooled into funds, which are then used for investment.
The investments can be in various forms such as buying out public companies, funding growth capital, venture capital, and distressed investments. A common strategy in private equity is to use significant amounts of borrowed money to acquire companies, a process known as a leveraged buyout. Typically, the debt used to support the company acquisition is placed on the portfolio company itself.
The investment in a company is usually medium- to long-term, typically 4–7 years.
This work involves verifying the financial transactions of private equity firms (transactions typically involve purchasing part or all of a given company) and then verifying the energy assets that these resulting “portfolio companies” own and/or control. We use metrics from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and similar organizations to estimate private equity firms’ emissions from their investments in fossil fuel assets.
The collection of physical infrastructure that necessarily operates together is defined as a unit. In the case of nuclear power, a unit consists of a nuclear reactor used as a heat source; the heat ultimately is used to drive a steam turbine connected to a generator, producing electricity.
Nuclear plants or projects can consist of one or more units, which may be built and commissioned at nearly the same time or at different times.
Contact
For questions about the Private Equity Tracker, contact Alex Hurley: